Page 137 - ARTE!Brasileiros #37
P. 137

truth is that when the artist produced collages of men with   the day. The ambitions of contemporary art, as pointed
               erected penises he was far from seeking anything that may   out by the philosopher Arthur Danto, are no longer
               be considered morally acceptable.                    aesthetic - what matters is the immediate contact with people.
               The radical nature and the importance of Hudinilson lies in   Looking at the panorama of this 32  edition featuring 450
                                                                                              nd
               the fact that he did not seek to convey any kind of uplifting   works from 70 countries, we found that most of them discuss
               message, but create a striking and refined work that   ecology, natural resources, cosmology and anthropology. There
               stemmed from his own choices.                        is nothing wrong with the concepts. However, the works that are
               Throughout the book Resende insists on that complacency,   on display are incompatible with the immense effort to set up
               which would be acceptable in an informal conversation   an event as large as the Biennial. For ten editions the São Paulo
               among friends, but unacceptable when it comes to     Biennial has faced challenges related to its exhibition space. In
               offering a thorough understanding of the artist’s career.   previous decades, the imposing architecture of Oscar Niemeyer
               In the absence of the artist’s own account of his career,   was “domesticated” by the works on display and the expographic
               the reader is left with the generous and compromising   projects attempted to prevent that the works were overshadowed
               testimony of a curating friend. As stated by André Gide,   by the lines of Niemeyer. Currently, the curves that consolidated
               “good intentions make bad literature.”               the architect gloom over the fragility of the art works on display.
                                                                    Unlike Biennials such as the ones in Venice, Lyon, Havana and
               1 | POSIÇÃO AMOROSA – HUDINILSON JR. (464 PAGES) PUBLISHER: MARTINS FONTES.   Istanbul - whose projects have remained open to the unknown
               AUTHOR: RICARDO RESENDE                              and to new concepts, while seeking to balance new, provocative,
                                                                    groundbreaking, collective, artisanal art with complex works
               2 |  PINTO NÃO PODE, (1981)                          by established artists - the São Paulo Biennial settles with
                                                                    “experimental” art, which is not always innovative.
               3 |  SEM TÍTULO (1976)                               The greatest moment of the São Paulo Biennial was in 1981.
                                                                    The event had reached its 16th edition under the curatorship
               REVIEW BIENNIAL | PAGE 112                           of critic and historian Walter Zanini, who eliminated national
               LIFE’S UNCERTAIN FOR BRAZIL’S MOST                   representations and organised the art works in the show by
                                                                    analogies between art forms and not by country. At the time,
               REPUTABLE CULTURAL INSTITUTION                       Zanini called museum directors and curators to discuss this new
                                                                    format. As a journalist, I closely followed the meeting during
                                                                    which we mourned the death of one of the members of the
                 ND
               32  SÃO PAULO ART BIENNIAL                           committee: Luis Carlucho, then director of the Venice Biennale.
                                                                    It’s surprising that the press has erroneously reported that the
               BY LEONOR AMARANTE                                   classification of art works by country in the Biennial ended in
                                                                    2006, in the 27th Biennial, which was curated by Lisette Lagnado.
                                              nd
               LIVE UNCERTAINTY? The title of the 32  Biennial couldn’t be   This false information may have been obtained from the Biennial
               more fitting. For the last ten years, the Biennial Foundation has   website. It is interesting that the same Biennial website informs
               provided indications that some “live uncertainty” has surrounded   that this change happened in the Biennial’s 16th edition, under the
               the most traditional, well-known and reputable cultural events   curatorship of Zanini. It is unfortunate that such misinformation
               in Brazil. We are not trying to form an opinion about the latest   is found on the official Biennial website, and that it continues
               editions of the event based on memories. This is not about recalling   to disseminate to the international public.
               that art event event that used to present the public with large   Back to the 32  edition, among its positive points, we applaud
                                                                               nd
               scale art works of great impact, able to leverage an entire edition.   the catalog texts by Julia Rebolledo. They are objective, direct,
               This is not about defending lineups that shine with the presence of   hones and reinforce the challenge of achieving a balance between
               stars as Richard Serra, Pipilott Rist, Joseph Beuys, Anish Kapoor   concept and form in art. Some works will be remembered,
               and Gerhard Richter, who have attended the Biennial before. As   including the video installation A Minute Ago, by American
               noted by art critic Rosalind Krauss, art fields have been expanding   artist Rachel Rose, a translucent game between architect Phillip
               for a while now, increasingly dissolving the boundaries between   Johnson, designer of the Crystal House and a storm on the
               different forms of art, announcing the collapse of the concept of   beach, and Ágora: OcaTaperaTerreiro, an “anthropological
                                                     nd
               autonomy in art, called “modern formalism”. The 32  São Paulo   installation” by Bené Fonteles whose concept discusses
               Biennial, curated by Jochen Volz, explores the use of natural   the core of all Brazilian cultures. Fonteles’ work is the result
               materials in art, encouraging artists who have not yet realised   of his interaction with indigenous peoples.
               how much creative freedom they have in their hands and hesitate   Philosopher Zygmunt Bauman says that the shapeless fluidic
               to break free from established routines and subvert traditions. Is   and rapid changes occurring in contemporary society have
               that good or bad? Frans Kracjberg way of depicting exuberance   resulted in what he calls liquid modernity. “The idea is to adapt
               in nature is much simpler. His sophistication and magnitude of   to situations, like water, according to the container in which
               shapes seem to overwhelm the eye of the viewer. The decline of   it is inserted.” This “green” Biennial has taken place in the
               the Biennial coincides with the economic crisis in Brazil. However,   same building since 1959 and this year, it tries to adapt to the
               ideally, the Biennial Foundation should reflect on its next steps so   immateriality of the new era. It invokes shamanic entities, focuses
               that the authenticity of the event can be preserved.   on man and nature, discusses biological questions. French Pierre
               That’s fine. Now times have changed. There was a time when the   Huyghe, for example, displays the video De-Extinction showing
               stock market overflowed with money, banks heavily attended   microscopic images of insects and a room with four thousand
               the Biennial Foundation ready to sponsor the biennial with their   flies. They follow the visitors and form a cloud over their heads.
               automatic teller machines. This is a different time. Money is short   As the flies of Huygue, a “live uncertainty” surrounds
               now. However, it seems that powerful artworks no longer fill the   us in these dark times of dubious character of politics,
               eye of the art system. Sharing is the new trend. Revisiting old   fragile economy and hazy horizon - as the quality of the art
               concepts and discussing current issues is becoming the order of   production and next editions of the São Paulo Biennial.








         INGLES_205X275_New_Ed 37 2.indd   23                                                                   11/21/16   8:46 PM
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140